
Attaining marriage equality for the LGBTQ+ community was a long-fought battle. Over the decades, there were near hits and mostly misses. There were commitment ceremonies that weren't sanctioned by the government and afforded no marriage benefits. Then, around the nineties, there were, slowly, state-by-state referendums and passages of laws starting with Massachusetts to recognise same-sex couplehoods but not full marriage. It seemed the straights, even liberal allies, were really hesitant to use the word "marriage." Even stalwart allies like Clinton and Obama hedged and hemmed and hawed over just how much equality would be allowed when it came to "marriage equality." And the year before the Great Orange One was elected, marriage equality was signed into law and became a reality on the federal level in 2015 with Obergefell v. Hodges. That meant that a marriage in one state was legal in all states. And conservatives lost their damn minds. Now, they are having their say and pushing back with every legal maneuver they can find as several states introduce bills to reverse marriage equality, or stymie its strength and recalibrate its legality.
Michigan, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas want to see Obergefell dismantled or weakened with loopholes and redefinitions. According to Eugene over at Instinct, here is a glance at what these states have proposed or are working on, whether they are simply symbolic or strive toward a more stringent change or overturning of current law:
Some good advice here:
And as we know, last Fall the Supreme Court refused to hear a case to overturn Obergefell brought by Kim Davis, the four-times-married, three-times-divorced KY clerk who, due to her closely held religious beliefs, has been fighting marriage equality since she refused to issue marriage licenses to queer couples back in 2015.
But this doesn't spell victory. The machinations of those nine states, other conservative politicians, and the work of groups like the Great Than Campaign will continue to use buzzwords and phrases like "traditional values" and "religious freedom" to create moral shelters they rhetorically gatekeep, to convince the voting population that their heterosexual family values are the most healthy, emotionally responsive, and longed for for children and couples. And damn any data that says otherwise.
(Marriage equality now and forever)
Questions? Comments? Email us at [email protected]
Follow us on Twitter and Instagram.