Sorry, but sometimes those tabloid headline writers get the better of us, and how else could we capture the brouhaha brewing (sorry again) over some cheeky photos of pinup model Lara Bingle. It seems Lara—who is famous down under for appearing in a big international tourism campaign—is suing Zoo Weekly because the "smutty" magazine published some unauthorized bikini photos of her. Never mind the fact that she already posed nude for the allegedly not smutty, German version of GQ. She says it's about her rights, not about her boobs, but why should Zoo Weekly be considered any less respectable than GQ? All exposure is good exposure when you're a model (a lawsuit makes for good free publicity, doesn't it?) and besides, nobody reads either one for the articles.
· "Bare Bingle shots won't stop Zoo blue" (smh.com.au)
· "Biff over bare Lara Bingle" (news.com.au)
· Lara Bingle - ZOO Magazine (the-feeding-tube.com)
· Lara Bingle's nude photo (todaysapatheticyouth.blogspot.com)
Previously: Catching Up With Emily Scott: "Australia's Sexiest Woman", Australia's Never-Ending Bikini Season