<![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony" - Fleshbot Comments]]> <![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony" - Fleshbot Comments]]> <![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony"]]> @jamye: It is nice to have an outlet where creators and consumers are able to actually discuss the product with each other. I'm sorry your video wasn't for us, though I'm sure plenty will enjoy it.

Thank you for responding to my comments, good/bad nonetheless.

Conrad

]]> <![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony"]]> hey conrad
sorry you didn't like the Personal Touch video. My idea is to blend cheesy, campy humor with sex and I realize it's not everyone's cup of tea. But it is different strokes for different folks and I do think that people will find humor and hot sex interlaced throughout the videos if they give them a chance.

jamye

]]> <![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony"]]> @Lux Nightmare: And more so, not everyone enjoys the same things. My review doesn't hold much stake in the Monogamy episode, we decided to skip it after the first in the series (Toying with Pleasure, i believe).

It is definitley nice to see Porn try something new, I just feel it's taking the slow route (not necessarily the scenic one).

Conrad

]]> <![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony"]]> @Conrad: Sorry to hear you felt that way. Like all pornos, it has its share of problems, but overall I genuinely enjoyed this.

Lux Nightmare

]]> <![CDATA[Jamye Waxman Seeks (And Finds!) "Monogamy Without Monotony"]]> Personally, the Personal Touch series was painful to watch. My wife and I couldn't watch for more then 3 minutes without laughing at how bad it is.

Conrad

]]>