Apparently, these highbrow illustrations are being used to explain, say, the concept of tittyfucking (in lieu of actual porn photos). Which leaves us wondering: if it's drawn, is it more or less dirty than a photograph? Frankly, we're not sure we know the answer.

· The best of erotic vector art on Wikipedia (NSFW) [I Heart Kink] (iheartchaos.com)

# Recordings of women experiencing orgasms
# Videos of nude men participating in "ejaculation educational demonstrations"
# Detailed photographs of men and women masturbating
# Images of mammary intercourse
# Close-up images of topless women and male and female sexual anatomy
# Large-scale photos of men performing oral sex on one another (and performing oral sex on themselves)
# An illustrated list of sex positions
# Threesomes
# Photos of nude strippers
# An image called "Virgin Killer" depicting a naked prepubescent girl from the 1976 cover of a Scorpions album (banned in the U.S.)

Our first thought upon reading this was that we are not spending enough time on Wikipedia. Our second was that we'd like to see some examples of this salacious content, because we had trouble finding any: those "nude" strippers are actually mostly* covered up, the sexual positions and anatomy photos are no worse than what you would find in a (really cool) biology textbook or on the Discovery Channel, and the gay fluffer pictures are tastefully non-explicit (at least by our standards*). What a ripoff!

Not only is this an unusually misguided display of anti-porn hysteria—anyone looking for free unblocked smut can do a lot better than Wikipedia—but their complaints show a shocking misunderstanding of how Wikipedia actually works. It's completely created, edited and policed by its users —i.e. anyone and everyone—and if there's a problem the users are the ones who fix it.

Take that infamous 1976 Scorpions album cover, which could be considered child pornography: it might have been banned, but one could also argue that it has some sort of historical relevance. If the community doesn't agree, then the community of Wikipedia users can remove it ... which they did are still debating**. (Here's the ongoing discussion about it, which predates the WND article by almost three years.)

Tattling to the FBI about nudie pics on the internet is like complaining to Congress about evolution. Hating it enough won't make it go away. Besides, one way or another people have to learn about strippers—so it's either on Wikipedia or in a strip club. Take your pick.

· "Is Wikipedia wicked porn?" + "Naked young girl photo troubles 'Wikipedophilia'" (wnd.com)
· Fluffing (Wikipedia)
· Wikipedia T-Shirt (bustedtees.com)

* Updated to reflect some specific photos which a reader bought to our attention after we posted this entry; however, we still don't think they're anywhere near as bad as the WND article makes them out to be.

** Update (5/9): Another reader has informed us that the banned Scorpions album cover has been restored to the Wikipedia post in question since we first posted about the issue, and the debate about it among Wikipedia users continues.

The delightful Katja Kassin revealed today that Wikipedans were lying about her. "Some things that are said there are simply not true. For example I am not bisexual. I do film scenes with girls but I consider myself 100% hetrosexual." In this post-sexual/pan-sexual world Fleshbot readers have created it is hard to tell who swings what way, if at all. We will accept your outrageous lifestyle choice, Katja; just don't tell us those two peroxide blondes we just saw making out for Jager Bombs at the Saddle Ranch weren't actually lesbians. - GP

· Katja Kassin on MySpace (myspace.com)
· Land Madel (gramponante.com)
· Picture swiped from L.A. Direct Models (ladirectmodels.com)

Previously: Babes Archive

· Mario Testino shoots a sexy spread for V Magazine that's practically made for folks whose offices aren't overrun by naked chicks. We could never work in a place like that. (popbytes.com)

· Slight update to yesterday's Ashley Massaro post: A tipster points out that according to Wikipedia (never wrong!), 2007 was not her first go-around with the Playboy company. Let the back issue hunting commence! (wikipedia.org - thanks David)

· Kids, if you're going to skip school to attend the "Boobs on Bikes" parade, try not to get your picture put on the front page of the local newspaper while you're at it. (stuff.co.nz)

· A German brothel is now offering an early bird special for retirees, because nothing beats an afternoon roll in the hay before Matlock comes on. (uk.reuters.com)

· A survey claims 20 percent of men cuddle with a teddy bear when sleeping alone. Are you sure they didn't mean a Teddy Babe? (We know what the girls are cuddling with.) (iol.co.za)

· A man breaks into a house, fixes himself a snack and then falls asleep, naked. No, actually, this isn't the same story we posted yesterday—it's just a really popular thing to do, apparently. (wafb.com)

* * * * *

Previously: Morning Wood Archives/Wet Spots Archives