<![CDATA[Fleshbot: government]]> http://tags.fleshbot.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/fleshbot.com.png <![CDATA[Fleshbot: government]]> http://fleshbot.com/tag/government http://fleshbot.com/tag/government <![CDATA[China: No Porn For You!]]> Internet giant Google China issues formal apology for being too slow, in the Chinese government's estimation, to remove all links to porn sites from its search engine.

The crackdown on websites that are "threatening morals by spreading pornography and vulgarity" continues in China, targeting sites like Baidu, Google and Sina.com. TV reports actually showed government officials hauling digital equipment from offices. We're glad we live in the good ole U S of A. Even though our own government may have made us sad for a good, oh, eight years, at least we still have our porn!

Via The Register: Sci/Tech News for the World. (theregister.co.uk)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5126656&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Real American Heroes]]> A 77-year-old Brooklyn man is being unfairly persecuted by the IRS just because he tried to deduct over $300,000 in "therapeutic" treatments for his chronic depression. You know, like ... prostitutes, erotic massages, sex toys and porn. That sounds pretty therapeutic to us. This guy should be given a medal, not a tax bill. (nypost.com; thumb via doctoradventures.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052191&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sex For Oil]]> Sex! Drugs! Corruption! Big Oil! No, it's not a "Dallas" marathon ... it's the U.S. Interior Department! Who knew that our nation's most boring cabinet department was also the freakiest ... or that working for the government could be so much fun? (telegraph.co.uk; naked park ranger via allthegals.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048997&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Your Tax Dollars At Work: Women Dig Porn]]> The federal government paid $147,000 for a research project to determine if women get turned on by pornography. Guess what? They do! Now give us $100,000 and we'll call it even. (abcnews.go.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Some Congresspersons displaying a not very...]]> Some Congresspersons displaying a not very firm grasp of technology are pushing for an alternative internet that is completely free—and also devoid of porn. You might as well ask for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich that is also free of peanut butter, because what would be the point? (xbiz.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036155&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ OK, we guess it's official: Toronto really...]]> OK, we guess it's official: Toronto really is the swingers capital of the world! But not if the city council has anything to say about it. See, it's a really diverse and cultured city ... as long as you don't upset the tourists with all that sexin'. (canoe.ca)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035542&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It was a bad weekend for fans of government...]]> It was a bad weekend for fans of government intervention, as California's "porn tax" bill goes down in committee and Turkey gives up on their porn registration plan. You may continue to fap in peace. (xbiz.com + hurriyet.com.tr)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035426&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 3rd U.S. Circurt Court of Appeals has...]]> The 3rd U.S. Circurt Court of Appeals has upheld last year's lower court ruling that declared the Child Online Protection Act unconstitutional. That doesn't mean they hate children, just that Congress isn't very good at censoring porn from the internet ... for now. (wired.com; Penny Flame's dramatization of what could have been, via AskJolene)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027892&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ellicott City, Maryland, has spent 11 years...]]> Ellicott City, Maryland, has spent 11 years battling "The Pack Shack" adult store and all they've managed to do is pass a few unconstitutional laws and give $187,000 in tax money to the store's owners. But at least now they can choose from a fine selection of used paperbacks to go with the sex toys and lingerie. Maybe City Hall just can't fight a determined sex shop? (baltimoresun.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021052&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Justice Department wants to amend the...]]> The Justice Department wants to amend the 2257 regulations (again) with the apparent goal of making them even more difficult to comprehend and abide by. Maybe this kind of stuff is what lawyers use to get off? (avn.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017417&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It's bad enough that airport security wants...]]> It's bad enough that airport security wants to make you fly without shoes; now they want to look at your naked body and then open your laptop and take all your porn! Gee, we wonder why people aren't as interested in flying as they used to be? (quickdfw.com + networkworld.com, via Fark)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=396073&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is porn still porn if it's not real? The...]]> Is porn still porn if it's not real? The FBI can't seem to decide if illegal porn can still be illegal if the images are computer generated. Well, we don't know about legal, but if you can jerk off to it then our standards have pretty much been met. (10zenmonkeys.com; image via)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=395247&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Breaking: Max Hardcore Too Hardcore For Florida]]> Following 14 hours of deliberation today, a Tampa jury found extreme pornographer Max Hardcore guilty on ten counts of distributing obscene material, the first time Hardcore has been found guilty in a career full of obscenity legislation. Hardcore said that he would appeal, and is free on bail until a September 5 sentencing. "I'm full of good spirits and they didn't get my house," Hardcore told AVN.

Hardcore's attorneys told jurors that no one could have purchased or seen the eight hours of fisting, urination, and mock-"underage" footage by mistake, and (according to AVN), several jurors approached the Hardcore team afterward and expressed sympathy, saying the poor wording of the legislation painted them in a corner.

2008_06_05_hardcore2.jpg
Despite past successful defenses for more extreme material than the likes of "Fists of Fury 4" and "Extreme Max 19," as well as the positive testimony of retired porn star Summer Luv—who told the jury that Hardcore, unlike other porn directors, "cared" and paid on time—the jury was unable to sidestep existing law, which counts as obscene anything that "appeals to prurient interest."

As a precedent, this case bodes ill for Evil Angel and director John Stagliano, who face similar charges for tamer movies. That case is not expected to go to trial until next year.

· "Closing Arguments In Max Trial Reveal Prosecution's True Agenda" and "Max Hardcore Found Guilty in Obscenity Trial" (avn.com)
· Max Hardcore (maxhardcore.com)

* * * * *

Previously: Porn Valley (Adjacent) Dispatch: Max Hardcore Busted, Max Hardcore Trial Update, Porn Valley Dispatch: Max Hardcore's Process

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=395217&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Max Hardcore Trial Update]]> So far, most of the legal wrangling in the obscenity trial of Paul Little (a.k.a. Max Hardcore) has been a prolonged argument about just how much porn a jury needs to see in order to determine if it's obscene. Believe it or not, it's the defense team that is saying they need to see all of it, a strategy which could backfire. After watching eight hours of hardcore porn in a packed courtroom, even we might get the urge to convict someone. (avn.com + tampabay.com + foxnews.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394229&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Stormy Daniels Does It For The Kids (Or Not)]]> Stormy Daniels descended on Washington, D.C. yesterday to speak at the National Press Club on behalf of the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection; the AVN Crossover Star of the Year, er, crossed over to deliver the message that kids who want porn can just wait until they're old enough for it, the same way they have to wait to vote or drink or get addicted to prescription drugs. (After all, there are plenty of old folks out there willing to buy her product, so she doesn't need to prey on the young and innocent to earn a buck.) Of course, Stormy commands quite a presence (even in a prim business suit buttoned up the neck), so we feel confident that her message was heard. Now what is she going to do about those gas prices?

· "Porn star to kids: Don't watch me" (examiner.com - thanks Patrick)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394113&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["Extreme" Porn Banned In The UK]]> We've had plenty of occasions here over the years to complain about own government's various attempts to curb our pornographic liberties. But all things considered, we've got it pretty good—especially compared to the UK, where a new law passed by the British Parliament and going into effect next week will place a ban on certain kinds of "extreme" pornography (whatever the hell that means). Oh, and it's not just a crime to make it, it's a crime to own it—which means the government can now bust you for what consenting adults created and what you as a consenting adult keep under your mattress.

Why is this happening? Apparently it's related to the murder of a schoolteacher five years ago and the fact that her killer had been "compulsively accessing websites ... which contained images of women being abused and violated". It's a tragic story, but hardly conclusive proof that certain kinds of porn automatically turn everyone into murderous psychopaths.

Unfortunately, the UK doesn't have a First Amendment to counter legislation like this. So what will happen to ordinary non-psychopathic folks who enjoy consensual extreme BDSM porn—or even necro fantasies—and who could now be considered criminals despite the fact that they're not hurting anyone? "Hard luck," says the murder victim's mother who spearheaded the legislation, adding that she "can't see why people need to see it" in the first place. You might not understand why some people are into certain kind of porn either, but realize it's a slippery slope: today's extreme porn may be tomorrow's dirtpipe milkshake (or today's anal squirting, for that matter) ... and then where would we all be?

· "When does kinky porn become illegal?" (bbc.co.uk)
·Thumbnail via hogtied.com

* * * * *

Previously: Belladonna's "Fetish Fanatic 5": Defend Your Right To Anal Squirting!

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385697&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ So, about that whole 2257 being overturned...]]> So, about that whole 2257 being overturned thing we heard about a while ago? It looks like that decision might get overturned too. Which bums us out, of course ... but we're not all that surprised either. (avn.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ OK, we're sure there's a very good reason...]]> OK, we're sure there's a very good reason why the reflection in Dick Cheney's glasses in this photo of him on the official White House site makes it look like he's staring at some naked chick with giant hooters, but for the life of us we can't figure out what it might be: either our eyesight is getting more pervy in our old age, or those fly fishing expeditions on the Snake River in Idaho really are as wild as we've heard they can be. (whitehouse.gov - thanks Kyle et al.)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378015&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ After failing to get JM Productions on obscenity...]]> After failing to get JM Productions on obscenity charges last year, the Justice Department is now targeting Evil Angel and its owner John Stagliano; the feds handed down a grand jury indictment against the company earlier this week. You wouldn't think a film with a nice wholesome title like "Milk Nymphos" would get anyone in trouble, would you? (avn.com + xbiz.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377895&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You know that itsy-bitsy $90,000 fine the...]]> You know that itsy-bitsy $90,000 fine the FCC threw at Fox for lewd television lewdness? Yeah, Fox isn't going to pay it. (At least not while they have a lawsuit about censorship coming before the Supreme Court.) Are they sure they can do that? Because we tried a similar strategy with our taxes and that did not end well. (washingtonpost.com)

]]>
http://fleshbot.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372523&view=rss&microfeed=true