This Website contains adult content which may include images, sounds, and videos of a sexually explicit nature. If you are under 18, please leave the site now.
Sponsored links
New York, 3:55 AM
Wed Dec 16
23 posts in the last 24 hours
The presence of men in the photos is dissapointing.It makes everything thrashy,pedestrian,anti-erotic.Everything is staged,lacking spontaneity and depth.The presence of pricks is bad enough,the women all look like hookers.You know,once there is no longer resisitance on the part of the females being shot,what have you got?Those boring pics in Hustler and Playboy magazines.If we have to enjoy pure eroticism,we must always remember that a picture or photograph of a woman's body has a short shelf-life.The longer one looks at it,the more it becomes boring.Now you add males and pricks,the more the poor women looks degraded,and so they play along.I am devastated by this moronic visual presentation of the art of pornography.Excuse my vomit please.
@LynnIris: Was that post meant ironically? Photos that look staged? Well, pretty much that's what happens on photo shoots. Women looking like hookers? Eye of the beholder, it's all subjective. There is porn out with the women dressed in very different garb, you just have to hunt for it. The presence of cock immediately degrades the women? Is this a philosophy that you think applies in private lives as well on a film set? I just think that is a ludicrous statement. Did you ask these specific women if they feel degraded? No? Well then you should not make that assumption on their behalf, they may not need you as their personal savior...
11/27/08
Obviously, somebody decided to make a porno after (re)watching the diner scene in "Reservoir Dogs". Like a virgin, indeed.
11/27/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08