Fleshbot 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 11:28 AM
Tue Nov 10
25 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@fleshbot.com
Editor:
Lux Alptraum | Email
Contributing Editor:
Brian O'Brien | Email
Contributors:
D. Cypher
AlwaysArousedGirl
Madeline Glass
Senior Erotic Consultant:
Gram Ponante
Founding Editor:
John D.
10/23/09
Think before you film guys. Isn't it enough to enjoy the sight of these women in person? By filming them you're ruining it for everyone.
10/22/09
10/22/09
10/16/09
10/11/09
10/08/09
09/23/09
09/22/09
08/26/09
08/26/09
08/17/09
08/14/09
08/09/09
08/07/09
As for the movie, I'm disappointed that they're moving the action poolside rather than having a larger beach presence. I'm sure it's cheaper to shoot at the former than it is the latter, but still.
08/01/09
And for clarification's sake, these denigrations are not in reference to Ms. Hazell, but are in regards to the statements of Ms. Lux, the Fleshbot staff, and the other commenters on this page who seem so willing to disparage the reputation and status of one who has previously been practically sanctified by this very site, simply because she has allegedly expressed a pro- public modesty opinion with which certain individuals do not agree.
I find it quite amusing that after spending years racking up thousands upon thousands of web page views (and, I would imagine, advertising dollars) derived from linking to nude pictures, videos and interviews of Keeley, Fleshbot is suddenly willing to strip her of her well-deserved Crush Object status (or retire her/put her on notice) because she (may have) expressed a personally held opinion that she is not a big fan of walking around in public with her tits out.
I think it's quite ridiculous for anybody here to complain about Keeley's (alleged) preference to keep her top on in public and her recommendation of the same for other beach-going women.
For one, Keeley has freely displayed her assets on countless occasions to the great pleasure of others; and has obviously been more willing to share her beauteousness than every other non- porn-performing editor, writer, and commenter on this site put together.
Secondly, I find it quite rich for an American website to be complaining that fewer women are willing to go top-free on public beaches, considering that the United States is one of the least nude-friendly nations in the Western hemisphere, and that the number of American nude beaches pales in comparison to the quantity in Europe, (and that's after taking into account the enormous population, land mass, and coastal territory of the U.S.A. in comparison to the countries across the Atlantic).
Finally, it is rather saddening to realize that freedom of speech and conscience are apparently not welcome without the threat of censure here, even though this is a pornographic site purportedly centered on progressiveness, tolerance, and the breaking of established boundaries. I guess I had the wrong idea about this place, since it appears that second-hand, uncorroborated hearsay regarding an individual's alleged comments in a tabloid journal is enough to sink a person's reputation around here.
08/01/09
If the comments are true (and a week later, we still don't know for sure that they are), then yes, she should be put on notice. And for me, this has nothing to do with the fact that she's stopped taking her clothes off for money. This is an issue that should be about choice. You should have the choice of whether you want to sunbathe topless or not. No one, not even Keeley Hazell, should be able to tell you that you shouldn't do it. You come out with a stance that is against the choice of displaying your body in a perfectly normal way in public, you get put on notice.
And the comments on American morality? The type of people who write for (and more than likely comment on) this website are exactly the people that would probably want to change those very things you brought up. But, obviously, we don't have the power to do so.
And I know The Sun is a tabloid and all, but "second-hand, uncorroborated hearsay regarding an individual's alleged comments in a tabloid journal"? If you really believe all of that, go find the article.
08/03/09
Because I totally love you and your opinions (in the least homoerotic fashion acceptable on a duo-sexual website such as this), I will respond to your comments as soon as I am physically and mentally able to put together a logical argument, once I've recovered from the pile of Robax Platinum that I have just downed with a fifth of Glenmorangie and a fifth of Jameson, consumed whilst watching Depp-narrated doc on Hunter S. T.
It's too bad we don't have our own Fleshbot forum to discuss the issues that have been brought up by the postings on the site, but I'm sure we'll figure out a way to continue the conversation later on.
08/07/09