By Fleshbot, 2:45 AM on Wed Oct 4 2006, 7,802 views (Edit post, Set to draft, Slurp)

Copy this whole post to another site

Slurp cancel

select site advertising consumerist deadspin defamer fleshbot gay fleshbot gawker gizmodo idolator io9 jalopnik jezebel kotaku lifehacker valleywag artists gawkershop

Lolita, light of my life, fire of my obscenely high-cut denim short-clad loins ... A decade ago, ads for Calvin Klein jeans were banned for their overtly sexualized depictions of scantily clad pubescent models; this week, Australia's Advertising Standards Board has given a new barely legal-flavored ad campaign for Lee jeans shot by Terry Richardson the go-ahead for display on public billboards. What's changed in the interim? Apparently, the board decided that "the woman is over 18, is fully clothed in attire that is fashionable amongst young women for summer, and that there is no nudity", and went on to decree that "consumption of this style of lollipop is now common amongst people over 18". Wait, lollipops aren't just for kids anymore? Guess that makes all the difference!

· "Lee's Lolita OK, board rules" (theage.com.au - thanks D)
· See also: "Lee trying the Calvin Klein kiddie porn campaign idea down in Oz" (adland.com)

Previously: "Terryworld", Fashion and XXX, The "Whores" of T-Shirt Hell, Trixie Teen for American Apparel, Girls In Jeans Megagallery, Dolce & Gabbana's Blowjob Ad, Lollipop Blowjobs, Visa vs. "Lolita" and EroticBPM