!["Spartacus": The Episode Called "Whore"](http://cache.fleshbot.com/assets/images/2/2010/03/126x100_d499dcbb111de1c65c.jpg ""Spartacus": The Episode Called "Whore"")
![Madison Ivy And Juelz Ventura Are Just "Working Girls"](http://cache.fleshbot.com/assets/images/2/2010/03/126x100_workinggirls101.jpg "Madison Ivy And Juelz Ventura Are Just "Working Girls"")
![AJ Bailey Is "Scared Sexy"](http://cache.fleshbot.com/assets/images/2/2010/03/126x100_scaredsexy120.jpg "AJ Bailey Is "Scared Sexy"")
![No MILFs Allowed; Tatiana Kush Is "Tight, Fresh & Loves Anal"](http://cache.fleshbot.com/assets/images/2/2010/03/126x100_picture_2_02.jpg "No MILFs Allowed; Tatiana Kush Is "Tight, Fresh & Loves Anal"")
Enter your username and password.
[QUOTE]:...Missy Stone's wet pink gash takes the kind of punishment reserved for enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay. What the hell did she ever do to deserve such a massive, hole stretching session? What about her steaming little cunt's Miranda rights? Did she waive them or what? Where is the Geneva convention when she needs it? We didn't see legal counsel present when her "lover" pulled out of her demolished beaver and unloaded a gallon of spurting man chowder all over her surprised face. [END QUOTE]
To analogize the experiences of the actresses who performed in this movie voluntarily, and in exchange for financial compensation, with the physical abuse of individuals unlawfully detained (according to international law) at Guantanamo Bay, is purely reprehensible. And then, to pillage the legal protections afforded by statutes such as the Geneva Convention for comedic material, while the aforementioned detainees themselves have been illegally denied the very rights endowed by these enactments, is absolutely loathsome.
I would have expected better from you, DCypher. Reply
To analogize the experiences of the actresses who performed in this movie voluntarily, and in exchange for financial compensation, with the physical abuse of individuals unlawfully detained (according to international law) at Guantanamo Bay, is purely reprehensible. And then, to pillage the legal protections afforded by statutes such as the Geneva Convention for comedic material, while the aforementioned detainees themselves have been illegally denied the very rights endowed by these enactments, is absolutely loathsome.
I would have expected better from you, DCypher. Reply
@Prof_Derzshowitz: "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good...Oh Buddha, please don't let me be misunderstood."
Clearly I was using dark humor to point out how absurd our justice system is. I honestly wish that our President would live up to his word and close that hell hole down.
That being said, I don't think my post is any worse than jokes made in 'Harold & Kumar Escape Guantanamo' or your run of the mill Bill Maher skit. Perhaps (as Letterman would say) they were in poor taste, but they were meant to be ironic.
I don't know who has the better mastery of hyperbole, you or I, but I am glad to know that you still read my posts and that you expect better of me. I will try harder.
Oh, and please skip my upcoming post about Wicked Pictures & Francois Closout's movie "Lies" - which still has a toned down (but easily misconstrued) reference to Anne Frank and the Holocaust. Thanks! Reply
Clearly I was using dark humor to point out how absurd our justice system is. I honestly wish that our President would live up to his word and close that hell hole down.
That being said, I don't think my post is any worse than jokes made in 'Harold & Kumar Escape Guantanamo' or your run of the mill Bill Maher skit. Perhaps (as Letterman would say) they were in poor taste, but they were meant to be ironic.
I don't know who has the better mastery of hyperbole, you or I, but I am glad to know that you still read my posts and that you expect better of me. I will try harder.
Oh, and please skip my upcoming post about Wicked Pictures & Francois Closout's movie "Lies" - which still has a toned down (but easily misconstrued) reference to Anne Frank and the Holocaust. Thanks! Reply
@DCypher: I apologize for misinterpreting the intentions and tone of your post. I should have considered that there might have been a significant level of irony in what was written, but, unfortunately, I interpreted it in a more literal manner.
You are absolutely correct in saying that the jokes in your post are no worse that those included in the "Harold & Kumar" movie or a Bill Maher sketch. I suppose it's just a bit easier to misconstrue their satirical nature when the humour is only literary (as in a blog post), and is not accompanied by the usual visual cues employed by film and television.
Still, I wouldn't expect a writer to accordingly make their satire blatantly obvious in order to avoid the possibility of misinterpretation, as much of the humour would then be lost. And I think that in many cases, it is the style of comedy so frequently deemed "in poor taste" which is the most scathing and effective form of satire.
Regardless, I will continue to read your new posts (as I would have in any case), as I have always considered your writing to be the most hilarious and entertaining on this site. But I'm glad that I now have a better understanding of your wicked brand of humour, thanks to your response.
In the end, I should have given you more credit, and should have expected better of myself. Reply
You are absolutely correct in saying that the jokes in your post are no worse that those included in the "Harold & Kumar" movie or a Bill Maher sketch. I suppose it's just a bit easier to misconstrue their satirical nature when the humour is only literary (as in a blog post), and is not accompanied by the usual visual cues employed by film and television.
Still, I wouldn't expect a writer to accordingly make their satire blatantly obvious in order to avoid the possibility of misinterpretation, as much of the humour would then be lost. And I think that in many cases, it is the style of comedy so frequently deemed "in poor taste" which is the most scathing and effective form of satire.
Regardless, I will continue to read your new posts (as I would have in any case), as I have always considered your writing to be the most hilarious and entertaining on this site. But I'm glad that I now have a better understanding of your wicked brand of humour, thanks to your response.
In the end, I should have given you more credit, and should have expected better of myself. Reply