By Dashiell Bennett, 12:08 PM on Mon Mar 31 2008, 766 views (Edit, to draft, Slurp)

Copy this whole post to another site

Slurp cancel

select site advertising consumerist deadspin defamer fleshbot gay fleshbot gawker gizmodo idolator io9 jalopnik jezebel kotaku lifehacker valleywag artists gawkershop sploid gawkertv

You may remember the New York Times writing a little story about three modern women who earn their living having sex for money, which was a very timely and compelling look at the current state of prostitution in this country, except ... two of those three women don't actually have sex for money. We guess the reporter didn't realize that "sex work" doesn't just mean hookers, but at least they made an effort! Sort of. (Gawker)